General suggestions for the network service code

[Dan Williams]

On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 15:53 -0700, Inaky Perez-Gonzalez wrote:
> On Thursday 09 October 2008, Dan Williams wrote:
> > 
> > Ugh, that thing really does need a rewrite with a *NIX-style build
> > system (even eclipse project files would work).  First, it should be
> 
> New releases (due this week or next) use automake, so that part is better 
> now.
> 
> > using correct CFLAGS for the architecture in question (-m32 or -m64 or
> > whatever) as determined by a configure script, second the directory
> > structure is really quite weird for a *NIX project and looks quite a bit
> > like a Windows port which it probably is.
> 
> I'll let Jayant reply to this one.
> 
> > ...
> > Marcel/Inaky, what's the status on the supplicant?  Any progress getting
> > other supplicants to work instead of the binary supplicant?  Is anyone
> 
> I'll let Jayant reply to this one also, as he has way more knowledge than I do.
> 
> > doing an open-source OMA-DM client that you're aware of, maybe Intel has
> > one they'd be willing to open-source?  Any open OMA-DM code from
> > anywhere would be a great starting point.
> 
> I have no idea; I know funambol had something, but as far as I was told from 
> somebody (I can't remember whom), it is not sufficient. Inside Intel we were
> thinking about it, but there are no concrete plans as of now.

Probably it was me, I've looked at it before and while it's OMA, it's
not OMA-DM.  It's just the sync portions I think, nothing about DM
exists there yet that I could see.  Might be a base to start from
though.

Dan